The post As 90% Of Adults Stress Over Food Prices, Are Radioactive Shrimp A Result Of Cost Cutting? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Types of shrimp, tuna, stingray, and squid serve as a seafood chili sauce food menu at a food stall in Malang, East Java, Indonesia, on January 16, 2025. The seafood menu sells for USD 0.62 – USD 20.13 per package. (Photo by Aman Rochman/NurPhoto via Getty Images) NurPhoto via Getty Images As food costs rise, and tariffs began to come into play, are radioactive shrimp just the beginning? Yesterday, Walmart customers across 13 states were confronted this with an unsettling recall notice: raw frozen shrimp, sold under the retailer’s Great Value brand, were being pulled from shelves after U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) testing detected traces of Cesium-137, a man-made radioactive isotope. The discovery sparked a huge reaction online, a concern about food safety, and also what this episode reveals about a global seafood supply chain already under strain from tariffs, rising costs, and growing consumer mistrust. According to a press release by FDA officials, the contaminated shrimp originated from Indonesia and was processed by PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati also known as BMS Foods. Due to this recall, BMS Foods is now on the FDA’s “red list,” barred their products from the U.S. until further notice. The radioactive shrimp were detected at four U.S. ports—Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, and Savannah, GA—before an import alert was issued by the FDA. Walmart quickly recalled the affected products at the agency’s direction, advising customers to discard lot numbers – 8005540-1, 8005538-1 and 8005539-1. While none of the products exceeded federal intervention thresholds for a recall, the suggestion of radioactive shrimp being sold and served on American dinner tables was enough to ignite public anxiety. A farmer dries fish in Suqian, China, on October 15, 2024. (Photo by Costfoto/NurPhoto via Getty Images) NurPhoto via Getty Images The Global Seafood Challenge Indonesia is one… The post As 90% Of Adults Stress Over Food Prices, Are Radioactive Shrimp A Result Of Cost Cutting? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Types of shrimp, tuna, stingray, and squid serve as a seafood chili sauce food menu at a food stall in Malang, East Java, Indonesia, on January 16, 2025. The seafood menu sells for USD 0.62 – USD 20.13 per package. (Photo by Aman Rochman/NurPhoto via Getty Images) NurPhoto via Getty Images As food costs rise, and tariffs began to come into play, are radioactive shrimp just the beginning? Yesterday, Walmart customers across 13 states were confronted this with an unsettling recall notice: raw frozen shrimp, sold under the retailer’s Great Value brand, were being pulled from shelves after U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) testing detected traces of Cesium-137, a man-made radioactive isotope. The discovery sparked a huge reaction online, a concern about food safety, and also what this episode reveals about a global seafood supply chain already under strain from tariffs, rising costs, and growing consumer mistrust. According to a press release by FDA officials, the contaminated shrimp originated from Indonesia and was processed by PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati also known as BMS Foods. Due to this recall, BMS Foods is now on the FDA’s “red list,” barred their products from the U.S. until further notice. The radioactive shrimp were detected at four U.S. ports—Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, and Savannah, GA—before an import alert was issued by the FDA. Walmart quickly recalled the affected products at the agency’s direction, advising customers to discard lot numbers – 8005540-1, 8005538-1 and 8005539-1. While none of the products exceeded federal intervention thresholds for a recall, the suggestion of radioactive shrimp being sold and served on American dinner tables was enough to ignite public anxiety. A farmer dries fish in Suqian, China, on October 15, 2024. (Photo by Costfoto/NurPhoto via Getty Images) NurPhoto via Getty Images The Global Seafood Challenge Indonesia is one…

As 90% Of Adults Stress Over Food Prices, Are Radioactive Shrimp A Result Of Cost Cutting?

2025/08/20 11:43
Indonesian Seafood Stall

Types of shrimp, tuna, stingray, and squid serve as a seafood chili sauce food menu at a food stall in Malang, East Java, Indonesia, on January 16, 2025. The seafood menu sells for USD 0.62 – USD 20.13 per package. (Photo by Aman Rochman/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

NurPhoto via Getty Images

As food costs rise, and tariffs began to come into play, are radioactive shrimp just the beginning?

Yesterday, Walmart customers across 13 states were confronted this with an unsettling recall notice: raw frozen shrimp, sold under the retailer’s Great Value brand, were being pulled from shelves after U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) testing detected traces of Cesium-137, a man-made radioactive isotope. The discovery sparked a huge reaction online, a concern about food safety, and also what this episode reveals about a global seafood supply chain already under strain from tariffs, rising costs, and growing consumer mistrust.

According to a press release by FDA officials, the contaminated shrimp originated from Indonesia and was processed by PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati also known as BMS Foods. Due to this recall, BMS Foods is now on the FDA’s “red list,” barred their products from the U.S. until further notice. The radioactive shrimp were detected at four U.S. ports—Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, and Savannah, GA—before an import alert was issued by the FDA. Walmart quickly recalled the affected products at the agency’s direction, advising customers to discard lot numbers – 8005540-1, 8005538-1 and 8005539-1.

While none of the products exceeded federal intervention thresholds for a recall, the suggestion of radioactive shrimp being sold and served on American dinner tables was enough to ignite public anxiety.

A farmer dries fish in Suqian, China, on October 15, 2024. (Photo by Costfoto/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

NurPhoto via Getty Images

The Global Seafood Challenge

Indonesia is one of the world’s top exporters of shrimp, and the United States is the largest purchaser of the crustacean worldwide. In the last 5 years, shrimp sales volume has increased from 275 million to 415 million pounds annually. Yet its aquaculture industry has faced repeated scrutiny for sanitary conditions. Environmental watchdogs have flagged processing facilities where seafood, particularly shrimp, is held in substandard environments, with overcrowded farm raised fishing ponds and questionable sanitary practices designed to cut costs – they are also creating condistions for contamination. And while Indonesia’s Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries has vowed to introduce a quality and safety assurance system for marine and fisheries products to align with U.S. and global import standards, there is still work to be done.

At the same time, American shrimpers along the Gulf Coast say they are being squeezed out by lower-priced imports, but they are looking forward to the tariffs to ease the pain. Shrimp caught in U.S. waters is generally more expensive, as domestic producers must follow stricter safety protocols. U.S. shrimpers have called on federal regulators to impose stronger protections, warning that unfair foreign trade practices and cheap imports are undermining their livelihood.

But the impending tariffs on imported foods, may further disrupt seafood markets by driving up the costs. The Yale Budget Lab estimates that new tariffs could raise food costs by another 3%, with some categories like fresh produce initially jumping up by 7% and processed rice rising in price by 10.2% in the long term. Other items expected to cost more include cereal, meat and dairy products. For fish and shellfish, the added expense could tempt suppliers and distributors to cut costs elsewhere in the chain— through the reduction of quality controls, or cheaper processing.

A shopper browses near the poultry section at a Walmart in Rosemead, California on December 19, 2024. An elderly patient in Louisiana is in “critical condition” with severe avian influenza, US authorities announced December 18, 2024, the first serious human case in the country as fears grow of a possible bird flu pandemic. Genetic sequencing revealed that the H5N1 virus in the patient belonged to the D1.1 genotype. This genotype has recently been detected in wild birds and poultry in the United States, and in human cases reported in Washington state and in the Canadian case, in British Columbia province (Photo by Frederic J. BROWN / AFP) (Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

Food Prices and Consumer Anxiety

This shrimp recall is hitting at a time when Americans are already deeply uneasy about the cost and safety of their food. According to a recent Associated Press-NORC poll, nearly 90% of U.S. adults report being stressed out regarding the cost of groceries, making it the #1 financial worry ahead of housing, healthcare, and savings.

The data backs up those fears. Over the past year, the Consumer Price Index shows food prices increasing faster than inflation with groceries and restaurants up 2.4% and 3.8% respectively. In just one year, from June 2024 to June 2025, egg prices rose 27.3%, while meats, poultry, and fish climbed 5.6%.

Consumers are absorbing these increases at the same time as they are told to be vigilant about recalls—whether it’s lettuce linked to E. coli, baby formula shortages, or, in this case, shrimp carrying detected radioactive material. Each incident chips away at trust in the food system.

21 May 2025, Lower Saxony, Cuxhaven: Crabs (North Sea prawns) already cooked on the crab cutter are loaded onto a truck in the port. German North Sea fishermen have suffered a setback in the legal dispute over special fishing bans. The EU court dismissed their lawsuit against the EU Commission’s corresponding bans in their entirety. Photo: Sina Schuldt/dpa (Photo by Sina Schuldt/picture alliance via Getty Images)

dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images

The Bigger Picture

So, are radioactive shrimp just the latest symptom of a broken supply chain—or an isolated event unlikely to be repeated?

The answer may not be clear for months.

The FDA says it is working with Indonesian authorities to trace the source of the contamination and in turn wants to tighten oversight. But the discovery underscores how global food systems, already stretched thin by inflation and tariffs, are vulnerable to lapses that would have once seemed unimaginable.

While some consumers will point to the system working, others will refer to this incident as a cause for deepening anxieties that food is both too expensive and too unreliable.

For businesses, it’s a warning that cutting corners—even through complex, faraway supply chains—can end up costing far more in reputational damage than in upfront savings.

Whether this was a one-off mishap or an early glimpse of what’s ahead, it has landed squarely in the middle of America’s growing uneasiness over what to eat, how much it costs, and whether the system designed to protect consumer interests can still be trusted.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dougmelville/2025/08/19/as-90-of-adults-stress-over-food-prices-are-radioactive-shrimp-a-result-of-cost-cutting/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Share
Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained

Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained

The post Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A sign is seen outside of the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” show outside the El Capitan Entertainment Centre on Hollywood Boulevard, from where the show is broadcast in Hollywood, California on Sept. 18, 2025. Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images Disney’s decision this week to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” from its broadcast network ABC is shining a light on a part of the media business over which the federal government has control.  On Thursday, President Donald Trump suggested his administration should revoke the licenses of broadcast TV stations that he said are “against” him. Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr has made similar threats, including during a CNBC interview, also on Thursday. It’s not the first time Trump or Carr has invoked the government’s power to pull a broadcast station license — putting an in-the-weeds part of the media business front and center for consumers, and flexing the government’s power over a major part of the industry.  What’s a broadcast license? Let’s start with the basics: Networks such as Disney’s ABC, Paramount Skydance’s CBS, Comcast Corp.’s NBC and Fox Corp.’s Fox are part of a system that requires them to obtain over-the-air spectrum licenses from the federal government in order to broadcast these household-name stations.  That means free, over-the-air service to anyone with an antenna on their TV.  Pay-TV networks such as CNN, MTV or FX, for example, are considered “over-the-top” and available for subscription fees. They’re often bundled together and distributed by companies such as Comcast, Charter Communications or DirecTV.  Broadcasters such as ABC are known for programming that includes local news, live sports, prime-time sitcoms and dramas, as well as late-night shows such as “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” Although the way consumers watch these programs has significantly changed from the days of using an antenna for free viewership…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 20:07
Share
Is Patrick Schwarzenegger In ‘Gen V’ Season 2? Why He Doesn’t Return

Is Patrick Schwarzenegger In ‘Gen V’ Season 2? Why He Doesn’t Return

The post Is Patrick Schwarzenegger In ‘Gen V’ Season 2? Why He Doesn’t Return appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Patrick Schwarzenegger as Luke Riordan/Golden Boy and Maddie Phillips as Cate Dunlap on season one of “Gen V.” Brooke Palmer/Prime Video Warning: Spoilers ahead for season two, episodes one through three of Gen V. Gen V is back for season two, and fans of Patrick Schwarzenegger’s Golden Boy might be disappointed to learn that he’s not part of the latest installment. Schwarzenegger starred as Luke Riordan/Golden Boy, the No.1 student at Godolkin University, on season one of the college-set spinoff of The Boys. His powers included manipulating fire, engulfing his body in flames, superhuman strength and flying. He had a promising future ahead of him and was even poised to be part of the premier supe group known as The Seven. But in a twist, at the end of the first episode, Luke flamed up and flew into the sky, committing suicide by using his powers and exploding. Still, Schwarzenegger appeared throughout the remainder of the season in flashbacks, a video message, his younger brother Sam Riordan’s (Asa Germann) hallucinations and in Cate Dunlap’s (Maddie Phillips) memories during episode six. It’s natural to wonder if Schwarzenegger would reprise the role in some capacity in season two, but the actor already explained why fans wouldn’t see him this time around. Schwarzengger Missed Out On Season 2 Of Gen V Because Of Scheduling Conflicts With The White Lotus Patrick Schwarzenegger as Luke Riordan/Golden Boy and Jaz Sinclair as Marie Moreau on season one of “Gen V.” Brooke Palmer/Prime Video Long before the release of season two of Gen V, Schwarzengger revealed that he couldn’t return because he was filming season three of HBO’s The White Lotus. Schwarzenegger starred as Saxon Ratliff, the eldest child of a wealthy family from North Carolina, in the Thailand-set season of Mike White’s anthology series. “No, I…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 12:44
Share