CRO investors are reeling from a Bloomberg report that revealed Crypto.com suffered a data leak involving the hacker group Scattered Spider. An employee account was compromised, exposing personal data, though the exchange claimed funds were secure and only a “very small number” of individuals were impacted. The disclosure, made much later than the event, has […]CRO investors are reeling from a Bloomberg report that revealed Crypto.com suffered a data leak involving the hacker group Scattered Spider. An employee account was compromised, exposing personal data, though the exchange claimed funds were secure and only a “very small number” of individuals were impacted. The disclosure, made much later than the event, has […]

CRO Crypto Investors Migrate North to XRP Tundra’s Twin-Token Wealth Expedition

2025/09/30 21:00
XRP Tundra

CRO investors are reeling from a Bloomberg report that revealed Crypto.com suffered a data leak involving the hacker group Scattered Spider. An employee account was compromised, exposing personal data, though the exchange claimed funds were secure and only a “very small number” of individuals were impacted. The disclosure, made much later than the event, has raised new doubts about transparency and governance at the exchange.

Combined with lingering controversy over the re-issuance of 70 billion CRO tokens after they were publicly burned in 2021, the trust deficit has widened. Many CRO holders are reconsidering exposure to projects tied directly to Crypto.com and are exploring alternatives where tokenomics, audits, and governance are defined in advance. XRP Tundra’s presale has emerged as one of the key destinations for this redirected capital.

Trust Concerns Surrounding CRO

The Crypto.com leak reinforced worries about how the platform communicates with its users. Investors voiced frustration that the breach was not reported promptly, and that internal security weaknesses were only uncovered by outside reporting. For token holders already angered by governance choices, the incident validated concerns that transparency is secondary to damage control.

The earlier CRO token supply controversy remains another sticking point. In 2021, Crypto.com announced the permanent burn of 70 billion tokens to strengthen the currency. Years later, a re-issuance of that amount drew sharp criticism from community analysts, who saw the reversal as undermining credibility. Together, the governance and security episodes have left many CRO investors open to shifting funds elsewhere.

XRP Tundra’s Presale Mechanics

XRP Tundra’s presale is now in Phase 4, with TUNDRA-S priced at $0.068. Every purchase comes with a 16% bonus allocation and free TUNDRA-X tokens, referenced at $0.034 for valuation purposes. Launch prices are already set at $2.50 for TUNDRA-S and $1.25 for TUNDRA-X, allowing buyers to measure entry against known future levels.

The project uses a dual-token model. TUNDRA-S, built on Solana, is the yield and utility token. TUNDRA-X, launched on the XRP Ledger, carries governance rights and serves as the reserve anchor. With 40% of TUNDRA-S supply dedicated to the presale, early participants hold a significant share of the eventual circulating base.

Yield and Staking Access for XRP Holders

Staking forms a central part of Tundra’s appeal. Cryo Vaults let users lock XRP for durations from one week to three months, with longer terms producing higher returns. Frost Keys, distributed as NFTs, adjust staking outcomes by either boosting APY or reducing lock-up requirements. The combined design targets yields of up to 30% APY.

Although staking is not active yet, presale investors secure guaranteed access once it launches. This structure ensures that early buyers are positioned to benefit not only from discounted pricing but also from the first phase of yield generation. Coverage by Crypto Sister has outlined how these staking mechanics may work in practice.

Verification and Transparency

XRP Tundra has prioritized transparency by publishing independent reviews. Smart contracts and presale mechanics have been audited by Cyberscope, Solidproof, and Freshcoins. In addition, the team has completed Vital Block KYC verification, documenting team identity and accountability.

These records contrast with investor complaints around CRO, where delayed disclosures have undermined confidence. For Tundra, audits and KYC serve as proactive tools to reassure buyers that both technical integrity and team accountability are verifiable before entry.

From Uncertainty to Defined Returns

For CRO holders unsettled by supply reversals and security lapses, XRP Tundra presents a presale that emphasizes clarity. Token prices at launch are fixed in advance, staking yields are described in the whitepaper, and audit documents are published for public review. With TUNDRA-S available at $0.068, bonus allocations in place, and free TUNDRA-X provided alongside, the project delivers a structure where potential upside can be measured rather than guessed.

Secure your presale allocation now and follow XRP Tundra’s official updates to be first in line when staking and launch events go live:

Website: https://www.xrptundra.com/
Medium: https://medium.com/@xrptundra
Telegram: https://t.me/xrptundra
X: https://x.com/Xrptundra

Contact: Tim Fénix, [email protected]

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Share
Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained

Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained

The post Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A sign is seen outside of the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” show outside the El Capitan Entertainment Centre on Hollywood Boulevard, from where the show is broadcast in Hollywood, California on Sept. 18, 2025. Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images Disney’s decision this week to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” from its broadcast network ABC is shining a light on a part of the media business over which the federal government has control.  On Thursday, President Donald Trump suggested his administration should revoke the licenses of broadcast TV stations that he said are “against” him. Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr has made similar threats, including during a CNBC interview, also on Thursday. It’s not the first time Trump or Carr has invoked the government’s power to pull a broadcast station license — putting an in-the-weeds part of the media business front and center for consumers, and flexing the government’s power over a major part of the industry.  What’s a broadcast license? Let’s start with the basics: Networks such as Disney’s ABC, Paramount Skydance’s CBS, Comcast Corp.’s NBC and Fox Corp.’s Fox are part of a system that requires them to obtain over-the-air spectrum licenses from the federal government in order to broadcast these household-name stations.  That means free, over-the-air service to anyone with an antenna on their TV.  Pay-TV networks such as CNN, MTV or FX, for example, are considered “over-the-top” and available for subscription fees. They’re often bundled together and distributed by companies such as Comcast, Charter Communications or DirecTV.  Broadcasters such as ABC are known for programming that includes local news, live sports, prime-time sitcoms and dramas, as well as late-night shows such as “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” Although the way consumers watch these programs has significantly changed from the days of using an antenna for free viewership…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 20:07
Share
Is Patrick Schwarzenegger In ‘Gen V’ Season 2? Why He Doesn’t Return

Is Patrick Schwarzenegger In ‘Gen V’ Season 2? Why He Doesn’t Return

The post Is Patrick Schwarzenegger In ‘Gen V’ Season 2? Why He Doesn’t Return appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Patrick Schwarzenegger as Luke Riordan/Golden Boy and Maddie Phillips as Cate Dunlap on season one of “Gen V.” Brooke Palmer/Prime Video Warning: Spoilers ahead for season two, episodes one through three of Gen V. Gen V is back for season two, and fans of Patrick Schwarzenegger’s Golden Boy might be disappointed to learn that he’s not part of the latest installment. Schwarzenegger starred as Luke Riordan/Golden Boy, the No.1 student at Godolkin University, on season one of the college-set spinoff of The Boys. His powers included manipulating fire, engulfing his body in flames, superhuman strength and flying. He had a promising future ahead of him and was even poised to be part of the premier supe group known as The Seven. But in a twist, at the end of the first episode, Luke flamed up and flew into the sky, committing suicide by using his powers and exploding. Still, Schwarzenegger appeared throughout the remainder of the season in flashbacks, a video message, his younger brother Sam Riordan’s (Asa Germann) hallucinations and in Cate Dunlap’s (Maddie Phillips) memories during episode six. It’s natural to wonder if Schwarzenegger would reprise the role in some capacity in season two, but the actor already explained why fans wouldn’t see him this time around. Schwarzengger Missed Out On Season 2 Of Gen V Because Of Scheduling Conflicts With The White Lotus Patrick Schwarzenegger as Luke Riordan/Golden Boy and Jaz Sinclair as Marie Moreau on season one of “Gen V.” Brooke Palmer/Prime Video Long before the release of season two of Gen V, Schwarzengger revealed that he couldn’t return because he was filming season three of HBO’s The White Lotus. Schwarzenegger starred as Saxon Ratliff, the eldest child of a wealthy family from North Carolina, in the Thailand-set season of Mike White’s anthology series. “No, I…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 12:44
Share