The post Was Pep Guardiola’s Arsenal Game Plan A One-Off For Man City? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LONDON, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 21: Pep Guardiola the head coach / manager of Manchester City during the Premier League match between Arsenal and Manchester City at Emirates Stadium on September 21, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Marc Atkins/Getty Images) Getty Images Manchester City played as no other Pep Guardiola team has played before in Sunday’s 1-1 draw away to Arsenal. Indeed, the 33% possession share City had against the Gunners was the lowest of any match played by a Guardiola team over the course of his 17-year managerial career to date. It was a backs-to-the-wall job by Manchester City and it very nearly worked. Guardiola’s side were a stoppage time Gabriel Martinelli equaliser away from claiming three points at the Emirates Stadium. The means very nearly justified the ends as City invited pressure on top of themselves for the majority of the match. The way Guardiola set up his team on Sunday raised questions about his future vision for Manchester City. Was this a one-off approach designed to hold Arsenal at arm’s length in the belief that Mikel Arteta’s side would struggle to break through a low defensive block? Or is this part of a framework for the future? LONDON, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 21: Erling Haaland of Manchester City under pressure from William Saliba of Arsenal during the Premier League match between Arsenal and Manchester City at Emirates Stadium on September 21, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Marc Atkins/Getty Images) Getty Images “When we defend deeper it is because the other [team] are better or we are shit,” said Guardiola when asked about City’s identity. “I prefer us to regain the ball high up the pitch, [have] a lot of possession to disturb the structure of the opponents and try to punish them. It’s always been like that… The post Was Pep Guardiola’s Arsenal Game Plan A One-Off For Man City? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LONDON, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 21: Pep Guardiola the head coach / manager of Manchester City during the Premier League match between Arsenal and Manchester City at Emirates Stadium on September 21, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Marc Atkins/Getty Images) Getty Images Manchester City played as no other Pep Guardiola team has played before in Sunday’s 1-1 draw away to Arsenal. Indeed, the 33% possession share City had against the Gunners was the lowest of any match played by a Guardiola team over the course of his 17-year managerial career to date. It was a backs-to-the-wall job by Manchester City and it very nearly worked. Guardiola’s side were a stoppage time Gabriel Martinelli equaliser away from claiming three points at the Emirates Stadium. The means very nearly justified the ends as City invited pressure on top of themselves for the majority of the match. The way Guardiola set up his team on Sunday raised questions about his future vision for Manchester City. Was this a one-off approach designed to hold Arsenal at arm’s length in the belief that Mikel Arteta’s side would struggle to break through a low defensive block? Or is this part of a framework for the future? LONDON, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 21: Erling Haaland of Manchester City under pressure from William Saliba of Arsenal during the Premier League match between Arsenal and Manchester City at Emirates Stadium on September 21, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Marc Atkins/Getty Images) Getty Images “When we defend deeper it is because the other [team] are better or we are shit,” said Guardiola when asked about City’s identity. “I prefer us to regain the ball high up the pitch, [have] a lot of possession to disturb the structure of the opponents and try to punish them. It’s always been like that…

Was Pep Guardiola’s Arsenal Game Plan A One-Off For Man City?

2025/09/25 22:33

LONDON, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 21: Pep Guardiola the head coach / manager of Manchester City during the Premier League match between Arsenal and Manchester City at Emirates Stadium on September 21, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Marc Atkins/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Manchester City played as no other Pep Guardiola team has played before in Sunday’s 1-1 draw away to Arsenal. Indeed, the 33% possession share City had against the Gunners was the lowest of any match played by a Guardiola team over the course of his 17-year managerial career to date.

It was a backs-to-the-wall job by Manchester City and it very nearly worked. Guardiola’s side were a stoppage time Gabriel Martinelli equaliser away from claiming three points at the Emirates Stadium. The means very nearly justified the ends as City invited pressure on top of themselves for the majority of the match.

The way Guardiola set up his team on Sunday raised questions about his future vision for Manchester City. Was this a one-off approach designed to hold Arsenal at arm’s length in the belief that Mikel Arteta’s side would struggle to break through a low defensive block? Or is this part of a framework for the future?

LONDON, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 21: Erling Haaland of Manchester City under pressure from William Saliba of Arsenal during the Premier League match between Arsenal and Manchester City at Emirates Stadium on September 21, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Marc Atkins/Getty Images)

Getty Images

“When we defend deeper it is because the other [team] are better or we are shit,” said Guardiola when asked about City’s identity. “I prefer us to regain the ball high up the pitch, [have] a lot of possession to disturb the structure of the opponents and try to punish them. It’s always been like that and always will be like that. If it doesn’t happen it is because we were bad, not because we want to [be defensive].”

Manchester City is in the midst of a transition. At the end of last season, Kevin De Bruyne, Ilkay Gundogan and Kyle Walker left the Etihad Stadium as part of City’s effort to revive and rejuvenate its squad. This was a process that started in January and it continued in the summer transfer window as the likes of Gianluigi Donnarumma, Tijani Riejnders and Rayan Cherki arrived.

Manchester City’s Jeremy Doku (left) and players training as Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola looks on during a training session at the City Football Academy, Manchester. Picture date: Wednesday September 17, 2025. (Photo by Nick Potts/PA Images via Getty Images)

PA Images via Getty Images

Guardiola is going through a process to work out what City’s next few seasons will look like. In the past, Manchester City has been the most dynamic, proactive team in English soccer. It was the epitome of the modern game for such a long time, but Guardiola is known for evolving his ways. Has he abandoned his principles to adopt new ones?

Liverpool is already five points clear at the top of the Premier League table with Arsenal also positioning itself for a title challenge. There is more uncertainty around Manchester City and its talent level and identity as a side. Sunday’s performance against Arsenal further muddied the waters around Guardiola’s team.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/grahamruthven/2025/09/25/was-pep-guardiolas-arsenal-game-plan-a-one-off-for-man-city/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Share
Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained

Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained

The post Trump threatening broadcast station licenses — explained appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A sign is seen outside of the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” show outside the El Capitan Entertainment Centre on Hollywood Boulevard, from where the show is broadcast in Hollywood, California on Sept. 18, 2025. Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images Disney’s decision this week to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” from its broadcast network ABC is shining a light on a part of the media business over which the federal government has control.  On Thursday, President Donald Trump suggested his administration should revoke the licenses of broadcast TV stations that he said are “against” him. Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr has made similar threats, including during a CNBC interview, also on Thursday. It’s not the first time Trump or Carr has invoked the government’s power to pull a broadcast station license — putting an in-the-weeds part of the media business front and center for consumers, and flexing the government’s power over a major part of the industry.  What’s a broadcast license? Let’s start with the basics: Networks such as Disney’s ABC, Paramount Skydance’s CBS, Comcast Corp.’s NBC and Fox Corp.’s Fox are part of a system that requires them to obtain over-the-air spectrum licenses from the federal government in order to broadcast these household-name stations.  That means free, over-the-air service to anyone with an antenna on their TV.  Pay-TV networks such as CNN, MTV or FX, for example, are considered “over-the-top” and available for subscription fees. They’re often bundled together and distributed by companies such as Comcast, Charter Communications or DirecTV.  Broadcasters such as ABC are known for programming that includes local news, live sports, prime-time sitcoms and dramas, as well as late-night shows such as “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” Although the way consumers watch these programs has significantly changed from the days of using an antenna for free viewership…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 20:07
Share
Is Patrick Schwarzenegger In ‘Gen V’ Season 2? Why He Doesn’t Return

Is Patrick Schwarzenegger In ‘Gen V’ Season 2? Why He Doesn’t Return

The post Is Patrick Schwarzenegger In ‘Gen V’ Season 2? Why He Doesn’t Return appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Patrick Schwarzenegger as Luke Riordan/Golden Boy and Maddie Phillips as Cate Dunlap on season one of “Gen V.” Brooke Palmer/Prime Video Warning: Spoilers ahead for season two, episodes one through three of Gen V. Gen V is back for season two, and fans of Patrick Schwarzenegger’s Golden Boy might be disappointed to learn that he’s not part of the latest installment. Schwarzenegger starred as Luke Riordan/Golden Boy, the No.1 student at Godolkin University, on season one of the college-set spinoff of The Boys. His powers included manipulating fire, engulfing his body in flames, superhuman strength and flying. He had a promising future ahead of him and was even poised to be part of the premier supe group known as The Seven. But in a twist, at the end of the first episode, Luke flamed up and flew into the sky, committing suicide by using his powers and exploding. Still, Schwarzenegger appeared throughout the remainder of the season in flashbacks, a video message, his younger brother Sam Riordan’s (Asa Germann) hallucinations and in Cate Dunlap’s (Maddie Phillips) memories during episode six. It’s natural to wonder if Schwarzenegger would reprise the role in some capacity in season two, but the actor already explained why fans wouldn’t see him this time around. Schwarzengger Missed Out On Season 2 Of Gen V Because Of Scheduling Conflicts With The White Lotus Patrick Schwarzenegger as Luke Riordan/Golden Boy and Jaz Sinclair as Marie Moreau on season one of “Gen V.” Brooke Palmer/Prime Video Long before the release of season two of Gen V, Schwarzengger revealed that he couldn’t return because he was filming season three of HBO’s The White Lotus. Schwarzenegger starred as Saxon Ratliff, the eldest child of a wealthy family from North Carolina, in the Thailand-set season of Mike White’s anthology series. “No, I…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 12:44
Share